What's Great for Amazon May be Bad for Both Partners and Customers

By Jacqueline Lee

Amazon Web Services (AWS) began in 2006 as a straightforward Infrastructure-as-a-Service offering, delivering the most basic computing and storage options. AWS customers had the flexibility to move their workloads from AWS into their own data centers or even into other clouds as needed.

Amazon partners made a lot of money creating third-party solutions for the infrastructure. Now, as Amazon starts to offer more proprietary solutions like its just-released OpsWorks, many worry that the company is undermining its own partners.

AWS launched the free service OpsWorks thanks to technology acquired from its purchase of Peritor. The advantage for AWS users is that they can manage their applications and configure them without resorting to multiple custom solutions.

The problem is that RightScale, one of Amazon’s Advanced Technology Partners, was already providing similar services. Puppet, AppHarbor and Progress Software are other AWS partners who could suffer because of OpsWorks.

As Jack Clark wrote in The Register, “Developers now have a choice between doing it all through Amazon, or adding in another vendor's tech – and therefore another layer of complication – to their particular cloud recipe.”

Also, if you’re an Amazon customer, then you could be giving up choices because transitioning data out becomes more expensive than putting it in.

Take a look at DynamoDB, which is AWS’s NoSQL database service. Companies start their cloud transition with AWS and start to develop applications using DynamoDB. The problem is that DynamoDB only runs in Amazon’s cloud. Customers using DynamoDB are now locked into AWS. They can’t switch cloud providers.

Moving into management services only makes sense if you’re AWS, particularly when you’re focused on wooing enterprise customers. At the same time, without healthy competition, AWS can significantly raise prices and drop services levels without fear of reprisal.

Last April, Amazon CTO Werner Vogels said, “If we are not delivering the right quality of services, you should be able to walk away. You, the consumer of these services, should be in full control. That is core to our philosophy.”

Driving partners out of business and locking in customers doesn’t seem consistent with that philosophy, but that may not matter if it’s good for revenue.




Edited by Brooke Neuman
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. [Free eNews Subscription]

Contributing Writer

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

3 Key Differences Between Turnkey and Custom-Build Command Centers

By: Contributing Writer    9/16/2026

Modern command centers serve as highly connected environments where operators work with large displays, multiple data sources, integrated technologies…

Read More

SkySwitch Bets Native AI Can Turn UCaaS Partners into Workflow Specialists

By: Erik Linask    9/1/2026

AI-powered UCaaS is transforming how MSPs and technology providers serve SMB customers by combining voice automation, customer experience, and busines…

Read More

4 Benefits of 24/7 Managed IT Support Services

By: Contributing Writer    8/26/2026

Modern IT environments grow more complex by the quarter, leaving internal teams stretched thin across expanding cloud infrastructures, security protoc…

Read More

We Asked Four AI Assistants to Recommend an MSP. Here Is What Decided the Answer

By: Contributing Writer    8/25/2026

A buyer who used to search "managed IT services near me" now asks ChatGPT which provider suits a 50-person firm. The assistant returns two or three na…

Read More

From Visibility to Action: Pure IP Is Rethinking Enterprise Technology Cost Management

By: Erik Linask    8/20/2026

As distributed enterprises struggle with rising carrier costs, unused services, billing errors and complex infrastructure, continuous technology cost …

Read More